State v. Williams — Supervisory writ denied as moot after trial court ruled

Case
State of Louisiana v. De’Anthony A. Williams
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Judge
Wolfe; Stromberg; Balfour
Date Decided
October 5, 2026
Docket No.
2026 KW 0983
Topics
Criminal Procedure; Supervisory Writs; Mootness; Motion to Quash
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

De’Anthony A. Williams applied for supervisory writs arising from proceedings in the 22nd Judicial District Court for St. Tammany Parish, case numbers 1122-F-2023 and 1423-F-2021.

The writ application concerned Williams’s motion to quash. The appellate court reviewed the record maintained by the St. Tammany Parish Clerk of Court.

The Court’s Holding

The Louisiana First Circuit denied the supervisory writ application as moot.

The court explained that the clerk’s record showed that the district court had denied Williams’s motion to quash on August 19, 2026. The appellate court therefore did not address the merits of the motion.

Key Takeaways

  • The First Circuit denied Williams’s supervisory writ application as moot.
  • The district court had already denied the underlying motion to quash on August 19, 2026.
  • The appellate court issued no ruling on the merits of the motion to quash.

Why It Matters

The disposition illustrates that a supervisory writ application may become moot when the trial court takes the action whose absence prompted the request for appellate supervision. The order resolves only the writ application and does not evaluate whether the district court correctly denied the motion to quash.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top