Claimon v. Monroe — dismissed an untimely application for discretionary review

Case
Guerdy Claimon v. Karlene Monroe
Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Judge
Not specified
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
A27D0183
Topics
Appellate Jurisdiction; Discretionary Review; Contempt
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

In a post-divorce proceeding, the trial court entered an April 9, 2026 order finding Guerdy Claimon in contempt for failing to comply with financial obligations imposed by the final divorce decree.

Claimon initially pursued a direct appeal, which the Court of Appeals dismissed on September 17, 2026 because discretionary review was required. He then filed an application for discretionary review on September 24, 2026.

The Court’s Holding

The Court of Appeals held that it lacked jurisdiction because Claimon filed his application more than 30 days after entry of the contempt order. Under OCGA § 5-6-35(d), the 30-day deadline for a discretionary application is jurisdictional.

The court rejected Claimon’s apparent argument that his application was timely because his earlier direct appeal had been dismissed for failure to use the discretionary-application procedure. It dismissed the application and denied his motion for contempt and injunctive relief and his supplemental motion to maintain a stay during the appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • An application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days after entry of the order being appealed.
  • The statutory filing deadline is jurisdictional, so the appellate court cannot accept an untimely application.
  • A prior, procedurally improper direct appeal does not extend or restart the deadline for seeking discretionary review.

Why It Matters

The order underscores that parties challenging rulings subject to Georgia’s discretionary-appeal procedure must use the correct appellate vehicle within the original statutory deadline. Filing a direct appeal first does not preserve the opportunity to submit a later discretionary application after that deadline expires.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top