Barrientos v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Travis Barrientos v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
TRAVER, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Nardella, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); BROWNLEE, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023)
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0862
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Travis Barrientos appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Polk County in lower-tribunal case number 2022-CF-007336. Circuit Judge Cassandra L. Denmark presided below.

The appellate opinion does not identify the offense, describe the underlying facts, specify the issues raised on appeal, or recount the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Chief Judge Traver and Judges Nardella and Brownlee concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District left the circuit court’s judgment intact.
  • The opinion provides no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The decision was not final until the time to seek rehearing expired and any timely rehearing motion was resolved.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Barrientos’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no explanation of the court’s reasoning. Because the opinion states only “AFFIRMED,” it offers no substantive guidance on the unidentified issues presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top