Ortiz — Appeal abated and remanded after appointed counsel failed to file a brief

Case
Raymundo Javier Ortiz v. the State of Texas
Court
Texas Seventh Court of Appeals
Judge
Judy C. Parker; Lawrence M. Doss; Alex L. Pratt
Date Decided
October 2, 2026
Docket No.
07-25-00280-CR
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Appointed Counsel; Failure to File Brief; Abatement and Remand
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Raymundo Javier Ortiz appealed his murder conviction and sentence of ninety-nine years of confinement. His appointed counsel’s appellate brief was originally due June 11, 2026.

The court granted counsel three extensions because of counsel’s caseload. It then warned counsel that no additional extensions would be granted and that failure to file by September 11, 2026, would result in abatement and remand without further notice. Counsel neither filed a brief nor communicated further with the court.

The Court’s Holding

The Seventh Court of Appeals abated the appeal and remanded the case to the trial court under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and (3). The appellate court did not decide the merits of Ortiz’s conviction or sentence.

On remand, the trial court must determine whether Ortiz still wishes to pursue the appeal, whether he is indigent, why no timely brief was filed, whether appointed counsel abandoned the appeal or provided ineffective assistance, whether new counsel should be appointed, and when a brief can be expected. The trial court must enter any necessary orders and file a supplemental record containing its findings by November 2, 2026.

Key Takeaways

  • The order concerns a failure to prosecute the appeal through timely briefing, not the merits of Ortiz’s murder conviction.
  • The trial court must investigate whether counsel abandoned the appeal or denied Ortiz effective assistance.
  • If Ortiz wants to continue, is indigent, and was denied effective assistance, the trial court may appoint new counsel.

Why It Matters

The order illustrates the procedure Texas appellate courts use when appointed counsel fails to file a criminal appellant’s brief. Rather than dismissing the appeal or reaching the merits without briefing, the court required a trial-court inquiry aimed at protecting the defendant’s appellate rights.

The remand also creates a specific record for deciding whether counsel should be replaced and establishes a deadline for returning the trial court’s findings to the appellate court.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top