J.F. — Third District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
J.F., the Mother v. Department of Children and Families, et al.
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
SCALES, C.J. (Rick Scott, 2013); LOBREE, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2019); Bokor, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2020)
Date Decided
October 8, 2026
Docket No.
3D26-0460
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

J.F., identified in the caption as “the Mother,” appealed from an order of the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County. Circuit Judge Carlos Guzman entered the order under review.

The Department of Children and Families and the Guardian ad Litem appeared as appellees. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying proceeding, the challenged order, the facts, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written reasoning, legal analysis, or statement of the issues decided. The opinion therefore establishes only that the lower court’s ruling was affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the order under review.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a three-judge panel.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying issues or explain the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the opinion contains no reasoning or factual discussion, it offers no articulated rule or analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top