Aragon — Fourth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Andres Aragon v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Ciklin; Levine; Klingensmith
Date Decided
October 8, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-1554
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Andres Aragon, representing himself, appealed from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. County Judge Giuseppina Miranda presided over the lower-court case, docketed as No. 062025CC049103AXXXCE.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., was the appellee. The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the type of ruling appealed, the parties’ arguments, or the county court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The appellate court provided no explanation for its disposition and announced no legal rule. Judges Ciklin, Levine, and Klingensmith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the county court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, the nature of the appealed ruling, or the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal at the Fourth District level, subject to disposition of any timely motion for rehearing. Because the court supplied no reasoning or factual discussion, the opinion offers no substantive guidance beyond the affirmance itself.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top