Griener v. State — First District summarily affirmed the circuit court’s decision

Case
Bradley Scott Griener v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe; Nordby; Long
Date Decided
October 13, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-0478
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Bradley Scott Griener appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Escambia County, where Circuit Judge John F. Simon, Jr., presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District’s opinion does not identify the underlying charges, describe the circuit court’s ruling, summarize the parties’ arguments, or provide the facts of the case.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. Judges Rowe, Nordby, and Long concurred.

The court supplied no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented. The opinion states only “AFFIRMED” and therefore establishes no articulated legal rationale beyond leaving the appealed decision intact.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Escambia County Circuit Court’s decision.
  • The ruling was unanimous and issued per curiam.
  • The opinion contains no facts, issue analysis, or explanation for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Griener’s appeal in the State’s favor and leaves the circuit court’s ruling undisturbed. Because the court provided no written reasoning, the opinion offers practitioners no articulated rule or analysis to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top