Background
Brian T. Dougan was the subject of investigations into professional misconduct. On July 23, 2026, he submitted an affidavit to the Rhode Island Supreme Court’s Disciplinary Board under Article III, Rule 13 of the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure for Attorneys.
In the affidavit, Dougan stated that he freely and voluntarily consented to disbarment and fully understood the implications of doing so. Disciplinary Counsel filed the affidavit with the court on September 10, 2026.
The Court’s Holding
After reviewing Dougan’s affidavit, the Rhode Island Supreme Court concluded that disbarment was appropriate. It ordered Dougan disbarred on consent from practicing law, effective immediately.
The court also directed Dougan to comply with Article III, Rule 15. Within ten days of the disbarment order’s effective date, he must file an affidavit confirming compliance, identifying every other state, federal, and administrative jurisdiction in which he is admitted, confirming service on Disciplinary Counsel, and providing an address for future communications.
Key Takeaways
- An attorney who is under investigation for professional misconduct may consent to disbarment under Article III, Rule 13.
- Dougan’s disbarment took effect immediately upon entry of the court’s order.
- Dougan must complete Rule 15’s post-disbarment requirements and file the required compliance affidavit within ten days.
Why It Matters
The order illustrates Rhode Island’s procedure for voluntary disbarment while disciplinary investigations are pending. Consent does not eliminate the attorney’s post-disbarment duties, including reporting other admissions and confirming compliance to the court and Disciplinary Counsel.