Patterson v. Johnson — First District affirmed the county court without a written opinion

Case
Quentin Patterson v. Andrew Johnson and Johnson Enterprises & Consulting, LLC
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; M.K. Thomas, J.; Long, J.
Date Decided
October 14, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1304
Topics
Appellate Review; Per Curiam Affirmance; County Court
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Quentin Patterson appealed from a decision of the County Court for Leon County, where Judge Stefanie Newlin presided. The appellees were Andrew Johnson and Johnson Enterprises & Consulting, LLC.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments. Patterson and Johnson appeared pro se.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. The opinion therefore establishes the result of this appeal but states no reasoning or rule of law supporting that result.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Leon County Court’s decision.
  • The three-judge panel issued the decision per curiam.
  • Because the opinion contains no reasoning, it does not reveal which arguments or legal issues controlled the appeal.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the county court’s decision intact. Its practical significance is limited to that disposition because the appellate court did not provide facts, analysis, or an articulated legal holding beyond affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top