Marion — Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling without explanation

Case
Barron Marion v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J. (Rick Scott, 2014); Khouzam, J. (Charlie Crist, 2008); Sleet, J. (Rick Scott, 2012)
Date Decided
October 16, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1325
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Barron Marion appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Thomas N. Palermo presided. The appellee was the State of Florida.

The appellate opinion does not identify the ruling under review, the underlying facts, the arguments raised on appeal, or the applicable legal standards.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the disposition and provided no reasoning. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Khouzam and Sleet concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling remains in effect.
  • The appellate court did not describe the underlying dispute or identify the issues Marion raised.
  • The decision supplies no written reasoning or analysis of Florida law.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Marion’s appeal but offers no explanation that attorneys can apply to other cases. Because the opinion does not disclose the nature of the underlying ruling, it should not be characterized more specifically.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top