Maraj v. State — Fourth District summarily affirmed the county court’s judgment

Case
Manisha Maraj v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gerber, C.J.; Klingen­smith, J.; Rebecca White, Associate Judge
Date Decided
October 15, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1176
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; County Court
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Manisha Maraj appealed from proceedings in the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, where Judge Caroline C. Shepherd presided over two underlying misdemeanor cases.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the charges, facts, arguments on appeal, or county court rulings under review.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

Because the court provided no written reasoning, the opinion establishes only that the challenged judgment was left in place; it does not identify the legal ground for affirmance or announce a rule of law.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s judgment was affirmed.
  • The decision was unanimous, with Chief Judge Gerber, Judge Klingen­smith, and Associate Judge Rebecca White concurring.
  • The court issued no explanation of the facts, appellate issues, or reasoning supporting its decision.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal in the State’s favor unless altered through a timely rehearing proceeding or further review. Its value as guidance in other cases is limited because the court did not issue a reasoned opinion.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top