Smith v. State — Fourth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jeffrey Smith v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
GERBER, C.J.; KLINGENSMITH, J.; WHITE, REBECCA, Associate Judge
Date Decided
October 15, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1500
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jeffrey Smith appealed from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, where Judge Andrew L. Siegel presided over lower-tribunal case number 062009CF018321A88810.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the ruling challenged on appeal, the arguments presented, or the applicable law.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

Because the court provided no reasoning or discussion, the opinion establishes only that the challenged judgment or order was affirmed. The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The panel issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the appellate issues or explain the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Smith’s appeal at the Fourth District, subject to any timely motion for rehearing, but offers no substantive analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top