Richardson v. State — affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a Rule 3.850 appeal

Case
André Bernard Richardson v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Jay; Wallis; Edwards
Date Decided
October 15, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0408
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Rule 3.850; Postconviction Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

André Bernard Richardson, proceeding without counsel, appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Duval County in a proceeding under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Circuit Judge Meredith Charbula entered the ruling under review.

The State of Florida appeared through the Attorney General’s Office. The appellate opinion does not describe Richardson’s claims, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the specific relief addressed by the ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for its disposition. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Wallis and Edwards concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in Richardson’s Rule 3.850 appeal.
  • The per curiam opinion states only “AFFIRMED” and supplies no reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify Richardson’s claims or characterize the circuit court’s ruling.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no substantive guidance about Rule 3.850 standards or Richardson’s underlying claims.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top