Suplee v. McCloskey — denied a petition for a writ of prohibition

Case
Amy Suplee v. Michelle McCloskey
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Per Curiam
Date Decided
October 16, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0282
Topics
Writ of Prohibition; Original Proceedings
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Amy Suplee, proceeding without counsel, filed an original proceeding in the Florida First District Court of Appeal seeking a writ of prohibition against Michelle McCloskey.

The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the challenged judicial action, or Suplee’s arguments. McCloskey made no appearance in the appellate proceeding.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal denied the petition for a writ of prohibition.

The per curiam opinion provided no reasoning or further explanation. Judges Ray, Bilbrey, and Winokur concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The court denied Suplee’s petition for a writ of prohibition.
  • The decision arose from an original proceeding in the appellate court.
  • The court issued a summary denial without explaining its reasoning.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Suplee’s request for prohibition but supplies no written analysis that would clarify the governing law or guide future litigants.

The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top