Curran — First DCA affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Mary Curran v. Federico Baldo
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Ray, J.; Treadwell, J.
Date Decided
October 16, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-3262
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Mary Curran appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Taylor County, where Circuit Judge Mark Feagle presided. Curran represented herself on appeal, while Federico Baldo was represented by counsel.

The appellate court’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, identify the ruling under review, or state the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. The opinion therefore states no legal reasoning and announces no rule beyond leaving the lower court’s ruling intact.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was unanimous among the three identified panel members.
  • Because the court provided no reasoning, the opinion does not disclose which issues were presented or why the appeal failed.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in Baldo’s favor unless altered through an authorized post-decision motion or further review. Its practical significance is case-specific because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance rather than a precedential discussion of Florida law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top