Background
Paratta, LLC sought mandamus relief from an August 20, 2026 order granting the plaintiff’s motion to expunge a notice of lis pendens and enforce an agreed order appointing a receiver.
The underlying action is Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, for the Holders of DBJPM 2016-C1 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C1 v. SH Airport Hotel, LLC, pending in the 61st District Court of Harris County before Judge Lee Kathryn Shuchart.
The Court’s Holding
The Texas First Court of Appeals denied Paratta’s petition for a writ of mandamus.
The per curiam memorandum opinion did not provide substantive reasoning or separately analyze the portions of the challenged order addressing the lis pendens and the receiver.
Key Takeaways
- Paratta did not obtain extraordinary mandamus relief from the challenged trial-court order.
- The order expunging the notice of lis pendens and enforcing the agreed receivership order remained undisturbed by the appellate ruling.
- The memorandum opinion announced the result without explaining the court’s legal analysis.
Why It Matters
The decision leaves the trial court’s August 20, 2026 order in place, but its summary disposition supplies no precedential analysis concerning lis pendens, receivership enforcement, or the requirements for mandamus relief.