Background
Chad Tucker and Michael Wysocki filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Texas Second Court of Appeals. The petition arose from Trial Court No. 24-169-DCFAM-0003 in the 97th District Court of Montague County, Texas.
The memorandum opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the challenged trial-court action, or the arguments supporting the requested writ.
The Court’s Holding
The court considered the relators’ mandamus petition and concluded that relief should be denied.
Accordingly, the court denied the petition. The per curiam memorandum opinion provides no further reasoning or discussion of the governing mandamus standard.
Key Takeaways
- The Texas Second Court of Appeals denied Tucker and Wysocki’s petition for a writ of mandamus.
- The ruling came in an original proceeding arising from a case in the 97th District Court of Montague County.
- The brief memorandum opinion does not identify the challenged ruling or explain why mandamus relief was unavailable.
Why It Matters
The decision leaves the challenged trial-court action undisturbed and provides no substantive guidance beyond the denial of relief. Because the opinion omits the underlying facts and legal analysis, its usefulness as precedent on mandamus standards is limited.