Millard Gutter Co. v. Nationwide Insurance — Reversed summary judgment because Nationwide offered no evidence that it had not issued the policies

Case
Millard Gutter Company, a Corporation Doing Business as Millard Roofing and Gutter v. Nationwide Insurance, Also Known as or Doing Business as Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Court
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Judge
Riedmann, Chief Judge; Pirtle, Judge; Piccolo, Judge
Date Decided
October 20, 2026
Docket No.
A-25-559
Topics
Summary Judgment; Insurance; Breach of Contract; Burden of Proof
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Millard Gutter Company alleged that 11 homeowners assigned it their rights under insurance policies after hiring it to repair storm damage. It sued Nationwide in its own name as assignee, claiming that Nationwide breached the homeowners’ policies by failing to pay the amounts due for the repairs.

Nationwide denied issuing policies to any of the homeowners and moved for summary judgment after discovery closed. It submitted the pleadings, the homeowners’ authorizations to proceed, and materials from another lawsuit, but no affidavit or other evidence showing that it had not issued the policies. The district court nevertheless ruled that Nationwide’s denial in its answer shifted the burden to Millard Gutter and granted summary judgment because Millard Gutter did not produce the insurance policies. The court later denied Millard Gutter’s motion to alter or amend.

The Court’s Holding

The Nebraska Court of Appeals reversed. A summary-judgment movant must first make a prima facie showing that it is entitled to judgment. When the nonmoving party will bear the burden at trial, the movant may satisfy that requirement by citing record materials that negate an essential element of the claim or demonstrate that the nonmovant lacks sufficient evidence to establish that element.

Nationwide’s denial in its answer did not satisfy that burden because pleadings frame the issues but are not proof. Nationwide produced no evidence that it had not issued policies to the 11 homeowners. Because Nationwide failed to make a prima facie showing, the burden never shifted to Millard Gutter, and Millard Gutter was not required to produce its trial evidence. The court reversed the summary judgment and remanded for further proceedings without reaching the remaining assignments of error.

Key Takeaways

  • A denial in an answer is not evidence establishing entitlement to summary judgment.
  • The moving party must support its position with record materials that negate an essential claim element or show that the opposing party lacks sufficient evidence.
  • If the movant fails to make a prima facie showing, the nonmovant has no obligation to produce evidence in response.

Why It Matters

The decision reinforces that a defendant cannot obtain summary judgment merely by denying a material allegation and pointing to the plaintiff’s failure to produce proof. The movant must first support the motion with competent record materials before the evidentiary burden shifts.

For insurers and assignees litigating coverage-related contract claims, the ruling underscores the importance of submitting admissible evidence addressing whether the insurer issued the policies at issue.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top