Stacey v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills — Court upheld recovery of temporary-disability overpayment

Case
In the Matter of the Compensation of Johnny A. Stacey; Johnny A. Stacey v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills-Schnitzer Steel
Court
Oregon Court of Appeals
Judge
Tookey, Presiding Judge; Egan, Judge; Kistler, Senior Judge
Date Decided
October 21, 2026
Docket No.
A188693
Topics
Workers’ Compensation, Temporary Disability, Overpayments, Statutory Notice
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Johnny A. Stacey had an accepted workers’ compensation claim for a disabling L5-S1 disc herniation. He returned to part-time modified work on May 5, 2024, but the employer’s claims administrator, ESIS, initially continued paying temporary total disability benefits because the responsible claims specialist did not know that he had returned to work.

After learning of Stacey’s return and obtaining his wage information, ESIS determined that he should have received temporary partial disability benefits and calculated a $2,644.63 overpayment. It notified Stacey that it would recover the overpayment by reducing future temporary partial disability payments. An administrative law judge denied Stacey’s requests for relief, penalties, and attorney fees, and the Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed.

The Court’s Holding

The Oregon Court of Appeals held that substantial evidence and substantial reason supported the board’s determination that the employer proved the overpayment and its amount. The record included Stacey’s and the claims specialist’s testimony, an indemnity payment ledger, an audit and calculation, and the overpayment letter. The court rejected Stacey’s argument that the employer had to introduce the underlying wage documents themselves, explaining that no categorical rule required proof through pay stubs or comparable records.

The court also held that the termination-notice requirement in ORS 656.262(4)(j)(A) and OAR 436-060-0015(7) was not triggered. Stacey’s temporary disability benefits did not end; they changed from temporary total disability to temporary partial disability after he returned to modified work. Because no statutory event ending temporary disability benefits occurred, the absence of a termination notice did not bar recovery of the overpayment. The court affirmed the board’s order.

Key Takeaways

  • An employer may prove a workers’ compensation overpayment through testimony, payment records, audits, and calculations; underlying pay stubs or wage records are not categorically required.
  • Notice required before temporary disability benefits “end” is not required merely because benefits change from temporary total disability to temporary partial disability.
  • A substantial reduction in the payment amount does not establish that temporary disability benefits ended when the worker remains entitled to temporary partial disability.

Why It Matters

The decision distinguishes termination of temporary disability benefits from a change in their form or amount. For employers and insurers, it confirms that an adequately supported administrative record can establish an overpayment even without the underlying wage documents and that a transition to temporary partial disability does not trigger the statutory termination-notice requirement.

For claimants, the opinion underscores that challenges to overpayment calculations must address the evidentiary record supporting the calculation; the absence of one particular type of wage documentation will not necessarily defeat recovery.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top