Winthrop v. State — Second District affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Brian Nicholas Winthrop v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Kelly; Atkinson; Labrit
Date Decided
October 21, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1622
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Brian Nicholas Winthrop appealed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Circuit Judge Philip J. Federico presided.

The Second District’s opinion does not identify the conviction, sentence, issues raised on appeal, or underlying facts. Winthrop was represented by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the appellate arguments. Judges Kelly, Atkinson, and Labrit concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, legal issues, conviction, or sentence.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion supplies no legal analysis or articulated rule for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top