Williams v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Paul Wayne Williams II v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J. (Rick Scott, 2014); Khouzam, J. (Charlie Crist, 2008); Sleet, J. (Rick Scott, 2012)
Date Decided
October 21, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1082
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Paul Wayne Williams II appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Lyann Goudie presided.

The appellate court’s brief opinion does not identify the underlying charges, the issues Williams raised, or the arguments presented on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Khouzam and Sleet concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.
  • The court provided no written analysis of the facts or legal issues.
  • All three judges on the panel concurred in the result.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the lower court’s judgment intact but supplies no reasoning that attorneys can apply to other cases. Because the opinion does not identify the claims presented, its broader significance cannot be determined from the published text.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top