Riley v. State — Second District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Sherida Dupont-Riley v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J. (Rick Scott, 2014); Khouzam, J. (Charlie Crist, 2008); Sleet, J. (Rick Scott, 2012)
Date Decided
October 21, 2026
Docket No.
2D2024-1961
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sherida Dupont-Riley appealed from an unidentified ruling of the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, where Judge Donna Padar presided.

The abbreviated opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the challenged ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the facts or law. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Khouzam and Sleet concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam decision without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying ruling or disclose the grounds for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written analysis explaining the appellate court’s conclusion.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top