Background
Karl Gustavson appealed a decision of the County Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Lorraine Kelly presided. The appellee was REM Properties I, LLC.
Gustavson represented himself on appeal. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.
The Court’s Holding
The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam disposition. Judges Kelly, Atkinson, and Labrit concurred.
The court provided no written reasoning or explanation for the affirmance. The opinion therefore establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed and does not identify any legal rule applied to the dispute.
Key Takeaways
- The Second District affirmed the Pinellas County Court’s decision.
- The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
- The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, appellate issues, or legal analysis.
Why It Matters
The disposition ends this appeal by leaving the county court’s ruling in place. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the law governing the parties’ dispute.