Manning v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Phynerrian Q. Manning v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Roberts, J.; Nordby, J.
Date Decided
October 22, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0685
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; County Court
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Phynerrian Q. Manning, proceeding pro se, appealed from the County Court for Bay County, where Judge William E. Dyer presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the nature of the proceeding, the issues Manning raised, or the county court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no analysis or explanation for its disposition. Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Roberts and Nordby concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the decision under review.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying facts or legal issues.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explanatory reasoning.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling in place but supplies no written reasoning for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top