Perdue v. Domicilium — Second District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Robert Perdue v. Sam Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC f/k/a Sam Domicilium Charleston Equity LLC
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; LaRose; Black
Date Decided
October 23, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2548
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Robert Perdue, representing himself, appealed an order or judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Michael F. Andrews presided. Sam Domicilium Charleston Borrower LLC, formerly known as Sam Domicilium Charleston Equity LLC, was the appellee.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues Perdue raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion. Judges Northcutt, LaRose, and Black concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented.
  • The opinion does not establish a stated rule of law or disclose the factual basis for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in the appellee’s favor but offers no substantive guidance beyond the result. Attorneys cannot determine from the opinion alone which arguments were presented or why the circuit court’s ruling was upheld.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top