Total Construction of Florida v. Chen — Fourth District affirmed without explanation

Case
Total Construction of Florida, Inc. v. Michael Chen
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
May; Shepherd; Shaw
Date Decided
October 22, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-3252
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Total Construction of Florida, Inc. appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Daniel A. Casey presided over the lower-court case, docketed as No. 062018CA025811AXXXCE.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the nature of the appealed decision, the parties’ arguments, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The appellate court issued a per curiam opinion consisting only of the disposition “Affirmed.”

Because the opinion provides no analysis, it does not state the legal grounds for affirmance or establish any articulated rule of law. Judges May, Shepherd, and Shaw concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the appealed circuit-court decision.
  • The court provided no factual discussion or legal reasoning for its disposition.
  • The opinion does not identify whether the appealed decision was a judgment, order, or another type of ruling.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in Michael Chen’s favor but offers no written guidance on the underlying legal issues. Its significance is therefore confined principally to the parties and the disposition of this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top