Lubin v. State — First District Court of Appeal affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Renelle Lubin v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts; Rowe; Kelsey
Date Decided
October 23, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0666
Topics
Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Renelle Lubin appealed from the Circuit Court for Madison County, where Circuit Judge Edwin Bailey Browning III presided. Lubin represented herself on appeal.

The State of Florida was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Anne Catherine Conley. The abbreviated opinion does not identify the nature of the underlying proceeding, the ruling being reviewed, the issues Lubin raised, or the appellate arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court in a per curiam decision. The disposition consists solely of the word “AFFIRMED.”

The court provided no reasoning, factual analysis, or discussion of the issues presented. Judges Roberts, Rowe, and Kelsey concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, the type of proceeding, or the grounds for the appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Lubin’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no explanation that attorneys can apply to other disputes. Because the opinion states only the disposition, no broader legal holding can reliably be drawn from it.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top