Carrasquillo v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Nicholas Carrasquillo v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wozniak; White; Brownlee
Date Decided
October 27, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1161
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Nicholas Carrasquillo appealed from the Circuit Court for Orange County, where Judge Leticia Marques presided over the underlying criminal case.

The appellate court’s brief opinion does not describe the charges, facts, procedural history, arguments on appeal, or nature of the challenged ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without analysis or a stated legal rationale. Judges Wozniak, White, and Brownlee concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no explanation for its decision.
  • The opinion establishes no articulated rule of law or fact-specific appellate analysis.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Carrasquillo’s appeal in the State’s favor, but its lack of reasoning limits its usefulness to attorneys seeking guidance on substantive or procedural issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top