Huey v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Donnell Emanuelle Huey v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Stargel; Wozniak; Mize
Date Decided
October 27, 2026
Docket No.
6D2026-2009
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Summary Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Donnell Emanuelle Huey, proceeding pro se, appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Polk County in lower-tribunal case number 2016-CF-003150. Circuit Judge Gerald P. Hill II presided below.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The Sixth District’s opinion does not describe the challenged ruling, Huey’s arguments, or the State’s response.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. Judges Stargel, Wozniak, and Mize concurred in the per curiam decision.

The court supplied no reasoning or legal analysis and did not identify the specific nature of the ruling under review. The opinion therefore establishes only that the lower court’s ruling was affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Polk County circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • The per curiam opinion provides no facts, reasoning, or description of the ruling being reviewed.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this stage of appellate review by leaving the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the opinion contains no explanation, it offers no substantive analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top