Bond v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Deshawn Anthony Bond v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wozniak; Mize; Kamoutsas
Date Decided
October 27, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-2514
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Deshawn Anthony Bond appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Lee County in lower-tribunal case number 21-CF-015883. Circuit Judge Nicholas Thompson presided below.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying charges, facts, procedural history, or arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Accordingly, the opinion does not identify the issues presented or provide legal reasoning for the result.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the judgment under review.
  • The decision was unanimous among Judges Wozniak, Mize, and Kamoutsas.
  • Because the court provided no reasoning, the opinion supplies no substantive rule or issue-specific guidance.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place, subject to any timely rehearing proceedings.

Its broader value is limited because the court did not discuss the facts, appellate arguments, or legal basis for affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top