Jackson v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Demetrius Alphonso Jackson v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Black; Smith; Labrit
Date Decided
October 30, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0695
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Demetrius Alphonso Jackson appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Kimberly K. Fernandez presided.

The appellate court’s brief opinion does not describe the charges, underlying facts, legal issues raised, or reasoning of the circuit court.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Judges Black, Smith, and Labrit concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the judgment against Jackson.
  • The court provided no written analysis of the facts or legal issues.
  • The decision was unanimous among the three identified panel members.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place. Because the opinion contains no reasoning, it offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues presented in the appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top