Holmes — Florida appeals court affirmed the circuit court’s ruling

Case
Sharrod D. Holmes v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Khouzam; Smith; Guard
Date Decided
October 30, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-1323
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Pro Se Litigation; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sharrod D. Holmes, proceeding without counsel, appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County. Circuit Judge Philip James Federico presided over the lower-court matter.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The brief opinion does not identify the underlying charges, the ruling challenged, or the arguments Holmes raised.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or further explanation for its decision. Judges Khouzam, Smith, and Guard concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion does not disclose the factual or legal basis of Holmes’s appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the appellate court supplied no analysis, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues underlying the appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top