Cimaroli v. Round Table Executive Group — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Lisa Cimaroli and Cornerstone Restoration Limited Liability Company v. Round Table Executive Group, LLC, and Jeremiah Couch, derivatively on behalf of Cornerstone Restoration Limited Liability Company
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
LaROSE; SLEET; ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM
Date Decided
October 30, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-1176
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance, Derivative Action
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Lisa Cimaroli and Cornerstone Restoration Limited Liability Company appealed a ruling from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, where Judge Hunter W. Carroll presided. The appellees were Round Table Executive Group, LLC, and Jeremiah Couch, proceeding derivatively on behalf of Cornerstone Restoration Limited Liability Company.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130, which governs appeals from specified nonfinal orders. The opinion does not identify the challenged order, describe the underlying dispute, or state the parties’ appellate arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision. Judges LaRose, Sleet, and Rothstein-Youakim concurred.

The court provided no reasoning, legal analysis, or statement of a rule of law. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the challenged ruling was affirmed; it does not disclose the grounds for that result.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the Sarasota County circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was per curiam, with Judges LaRose, Sleet, and Rothstein-Youakim concurring.
  • The opinion does not describe the challenged order or explain the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the challenged circuit court ruling undisturbed, but its practical and doctrinal significance cannot be determined from the opinion alone. Attorneys evaluating the dispute would need the lower-court order and appellate filings to identify the issues presented and understand the effect of the affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top