Silberberg v. Diaz — Fourth District affirmed the trial court’s ruling

Case
Dawn Silberberg v. Danny Diaz
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Ciklin; Klingensmith; Lott
Date Decided
October 29, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-2608
Topics
Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dawn Silberberg appealed a ruling from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Marlon Jay Weiss entered the ruling under lower-tribunal case number 062020DR004234AXXXCE.

The appellate opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the trial court’s ruling, the arguments on appeal, or the applicable legal standards.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. Judges Ciklin, Klingensmith, and Lott concurred in the per curiam decision.

The opinion provides no explanatory reasoning or discussion of the merits. It states only that the trial court’s ruling is affirmed and notes that the decision is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a three-judge panel consisting of Judges Ciklin, Klingensmith, and Lott.
  • The opinion supplies no facts, legal analysis, or explanation for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its immediate significance therefore lies in the disposition of this appeal rather than in the announcement or clarification of a legal rule.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top