Pamatat — Fourth DCA affirmed a nonfinal family-court order without explanation

Case
Darren Michael Pamatat v. Einat Dekel-Pamatat
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
May; Levine; Shepherd
Date Decided
October 29, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-1616
Topics
Family Law; Nonfinal Orders; Appellate Review
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Darren Michael Pamatat appealed a nonfinal order entered in litigation against Einat Dekel-Pamatat in the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. Circuit Judge Rosemarie Scher entered the order in trial-court case number 502025DR006763XXXANB.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, identify the nature of the challenged nonfinal order, or state the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the nonfinal order. Its disposition therefore left the challenged ruling in place.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without an accompanying explanation. The opinion announces no legal rule and provides no reasoning establishing why the order was affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the Palm Beach County circuit court’s nonfinal order.
  • The decision was per curiam and contained no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this interlocutory appeal in favor of the appellee and leaves the trial court’s order undisturbed. Because the court did not explain its reasoning or identify the issue presented, the opinion offers no substantive guidance beyond the result in this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top