Dunn v. State — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Lucas William Dunn v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe; Ray; Nordby
Date Decided
November 2, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2754
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Lucas William Dunn appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Suwannee County, where Judge Kathryn R. Land presided. The First District Court of Appeal’s decision does not identify the underlying charges, the challenged ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

Dunn was represented on appeal by W. Charles Fletcher. The State was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Robert Charles Lee.

The Court’s Holding

The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition. Judges Rowe, Ray, and Nordby concurred.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the issues. The decision therefore resolves Dunn’s appeal but announces no express legal rule or rationale beyond affirmance of the judgment below.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The ruling was unanimous and issued per curiam without a written opinion.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the appellate court supplied no facts, analysis, or legal reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance beyond the result in Dunn’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top