Carpenter v. Princehorn — Fifth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Malcolm Carpenter v. Erik Princehorn, Individually, and o/b/o K.P., and K.P., Children
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Lambert; Harris
Date Decided
November 3, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2359
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Malcolm Carpenter appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Seminole County in a case involving Erik Princehorn, individually and on behalf of K.P., and K.P., children. Circuit Judge John L. Woodard, III, presided below.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the nature of the challenged ruling, or Carpenter’s arguments on appeal. The appellee made no appearance in the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. Judges Makar, Lambert, and Harris concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the facts, appellate issues, or legal grounds for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but provides no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore primarily to the parties and the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top