Washington v. State — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Roderick Washington v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Ray; M.K. THOMAS (Rick Scott, 2016); Long
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-1495
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Roderick Washington, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Leon County, where Judge Tiffany Baker-Carper presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying case, the order being appealed, the arguments presented, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition. Judges Ray, M.K. Thomas, and Long concurred.

The court provided no written reasoning and announced no express rule of law. The disposition was designated not final until resolution of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The three-judge panel consisted of Judges Ray, M.K. Thomas, and Long.
  • Because the opinion contains no factual discussion or legal analysis, it does not disclose the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in the State’s favor, subject to any timely and authorized post-decision motion. Its practical significance beyond the parties is limited because the court did not explain its reasoning or identify the legal issues presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top