Findlay v. Reed — affirmed the county court without a written explanation

Case
Kenton Findlay v. Mucola Reed
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Ray; Bilbrey; Kelsey
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0291
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance; County Court
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kenton Findlay appealed a decision of the County Court for Leon County, where Judge Monique R. Richardson presided. Findlay and appellee Mucola Reed each appeared without counsel.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Ray, Bilbrey, and Kelsey concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s decision remains in place.
  • The appellate court affirmed without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rule addressing the underlying dispute.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in Reed’s favor but offers no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. Because the opinion does not identify the issues presented, no broader substantive holding can reliably be drawn from it.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top