Wallace v. State — Second District affirms without a written explanation

Case
Herman Wallace v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; LaRose; Sleet
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-2083
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Summary Affirmance, Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Herman Wallace, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Philip James Federico presided.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The Second District’s opinion does not describe Wallace’s claims, the underlying proceedings, or the circuit court ruling under review.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam disposition consisting only of the word “Affirmed.” It provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented. Judges Northcutt, LaRose, and Sleet concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision provides no explanation of the court’s reasoning or the issues Wallace raised.
  • The appeal was brought pro se under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Wallace’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top