Barthmaier v. State — Florida appellate court summarily affirmed the circuit court’s ruling

Case
Robert Barthmaier v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; LaRose; Sleet
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1127
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Summary Affirmance, Postconviction Review
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Robert Barthmaier appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge G. Gregory Green presided.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2), which governs certain appeals from summary postconviction proceedings. The opinion provides no additional facts, claims, or procedural details.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The per curiam opinion contains no analysis and does not identify the grounds for affirmance. Judges Northcutt, LaRose, and Sleet concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written reasoning for use in evaluating the underlying claims.

Because the opinion states only “Affirmed,” it announces no express rule of law or broader doctrinal holding.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top