Vega Andrada — Third District summarily affirmed the circuit court’s ruling

Case
Jose Alejandro Vega Andrada v. Sahira Johana Oviedo Luzardo
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gordo; Lobree; Gooden
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
3D25-2017
Topics
Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jose Alejandro Vega Andrada appealed a ruling entered in a case against Sahira Johana Oviedo Luzardo in the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County. Circuit Judge Charles K. Johnson presided over the lower-court matter, docketed as No. 22-13336-CA-01.

The Third District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments raised on appeal, or the applicable substantive law.

The Court’s Holding

The Third District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision. Judges Gordo, Lobree, and Gooden comprised the panel.

Because the opinion consists solely of the disposition “Affirmed,” it provides no reasoning or explanation for the result. The opinion also states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying legal issues or establish an articulated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the appealed circuit court ruling in place. Its practical significance beyond the parties is limited because the appellate court did not provide facts, legal analysis, or an express basis for affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top