Futch v. WSH Beacon Place, LLC — Georgia Court of Appeals denies emergency stay of writ of possession

Case
FUTCH v. WSH BEACON PLACE, LLC.
Court
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Judge
Not specified
Date Decided
November 2, 2026
Docket No.
A27E0046
Topics
Emergency motion; Stay; Writ of possession; Disposition notice
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

This is a concise Disposition notice for an outcome-only order, not a summary of a developed opinion. John Randall Futch filed an emergency motion to stay in the Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia. He asked the court to issue a stay of the Chatham County Superior Court’s writ of possession.

The public document identifies the case as A27E0046, FUTCH v. WSH BEACON PLACE, LLC, and is dated November 2, 2026. It does not describe the underlying dispute, the proceedings that produced the writ, or the arguments presented in the motion.

The Court’s Holding

The Court of Appeals denied Futch’s emergency motion. The order states that, upon consideration of the motion and the issues raised therein, the emergency motion is “hereby DENIED.”

No substantive reasoning for the denial is available in the public order. It supplies no legal analysis, factual findings, or explanation of the grounds for its decision, and none should be inferred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Court of Appeals denied John Randall Futch’s emergency motion to stay.
  • The requested stay concerned the Chatham County Superior Court’s writ of possession.
  • The order gives the outcome but no substantive explanation beyond stating that the court considered the motion and the issues raised in it.

Why It Matters

The order establishes the disposition of the emergency motion in this docket: the requested stay was denied. It does not announce a legal standard or explain how the court evaluated the motion.

The document also contains the clerk’s certification that the order is a true extract from the court’s minutes. The signature is not reliably readable as a typed name, and the order identifies no deciding judge.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top