Background
Carlos Sanchez Varela appealed his criminal conviction from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (USDC No. 2:23-CR-2915-1). His appointed appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw along with a brief conforming to the procedure established in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and further refined in United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Under this procedure, counsel who believes an appeal lacks merit may request withdrawal after filing a brief that examines the record and identifies any potentially arguable issues.
Sanchez Varela did not file a response to counsel’s motion or brief. A three-judge panel consisting of Circuit Judges Jones, Duncan, and Douglas reviewed both the motion and the relevant portions of the record.
The Fifth Circuit agreed with counsel’s assessment and concluded that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. The court granted counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw and dismissed the appeal entirely. This dismissal was based on the court’s independent review of counsel’s brief and the record, which satisfied the court that there were no arguable grounds for reversal or modification of the conviction.
The decision reflects the standard operation of Anders procedure in the Fifth Circuit, where appointed counsel may seek withdrawal when they conclude in good faith that an appeal is frivolous, subject to judicial verification that the assessment is correct.
This decision illustrates how the Fifth Circuit manages frivolous appeals while protecting constitutional rights. The Anders procedure balances efficiency with fairness: appointed counsel need not advance arguments they believe to be meritless, yet courts conduct independent review to prevent premature dismissal. This case confirms that the Fifth Circuit takes seriously its gatekeeping role, reviewing the record itself rather than rubber-stamping counsel’s conclusions.
For appellants, the lesson is clear: Anders dismissals are not automatic. However, defendants must present some colorable argument or risk having their appeals dismissed without further review. The procedure remains an important tool for managing appellate dockets while respecting due process.
✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.