Parker v. Ohio Development, LLC — Appeal dismissed at appellant’s request

Case
Jay Parker v. Ohio Development, LLC
Court
Texas Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio
Judge
Rebeca C. Martinez (elected 2012); H. Todd McCray (elected 2024)
Date Decided
June 24, 2026
Docket No.
04-26-00011-CV
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Appeal Dismissal, Civil Appeals
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jay Parker appealed a decision from the 216th Judicial District Court in Kendall County, Texas (Trial Court No. 12-298A), where Judge Kirsten Cohoon was presiding. The appeal involved a dispute with Ohio Development, LLC and was pending before the Fourth Court of Appeals.

The Court’s Holding

On May 14, 2026, Parker filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. The Fourth Court of Appeals granted the motion and dismissed the appeal. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(d), costs of the appeal were assessed against the appellant.

Key Takeaways

  • Appellants may dismiss their own appeals by unopposed motion.
  • When an appeal is dismissed at the appellant’s request, appellate costs are assessed to the appellant.
  • A dismissal by motion is a procedural order that does not address the merits of the underlying dispute.

Why It Matters

This dismissal order illustrates the appellate process for voluntary withdrawal of appeals. Parties pursuing appeals should be aware that dismissing an appeal will result in cost liability, making settlement or reinstatement of trial court judgments alternatives to appellate continuation.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top