Coverage since November 3, 1994

Federal Circuit

Uncategorized

Ultramercial v. Hulu (2014) — Federal Circuit Finally Strikes Down Ad-for-Content Patent as Abstract Idea Under Alice

On its third visit to the Federal Circuit, Ultramercial’s patent on ad-supported online media distribution was finally struck down as an abstract idea — completing a legal journey that spanned four years, two Federal Circuit opinions, and two Supreme Court remands, all bookended by the Alice d

Uncategorized

Halo Electronics v. Pulse Electronics — Federal Circuit Affirms High “Seagate” Bar for Enhanced Damages, Setting Up Supreme Court Reversal

The Federal Circuit affirmed its two-part Seagate test for enhanced patent damages, refusing to award treble damages even where a jury found willful infringement — a holding the Supreme Court would reverse in 2016 by eliminating the objective recklessness requirement and restoring broader district c

Uncategorized

VirnetX v. Cisco Systems — Federal Circuit Vacates $368M Patent Damages for Failure to Apportion and Improper Royalty Methodology

The Federal Circuit vacated a $368 million patent verdict against Cisco and Apple in VirnetX’s network security patent case, rejecting the Nash Bargaining Solution as a royalty methodology and requiring strict apportionment to the patented features even when the smallest salable unit is the ac

Uncategorized

Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology — Federal Circuit Awards $1.5B for Willful Infringement of Hard Drive Signal Processing Patents

The Federal Circuit affirmed a landmark $1.5 billion damages award against Marvell Technology for willful infringement of Carnegie Mellon University’s hard drive signal processing patents — one of the largest patent verdicts in history — while vacating parts of the damages calculation and rema

Uncategorized

Digitech Image Technologies v. Electronics for Imaging — Federal Circuit Holds Data Structures and Mathematical Relationships Are Not Patentable

The Federal Circuit held that a patent claiming an image device profile — a collection of color and spatial data — was patent-ineligible, finding that a data structure without physical embodiment is not patentable, and that methods consisting only of mathematical correlations are abstract ideas.

Scroll to Top