Utility Patent Cases
Coverage since November 3, 1994

Utility Patent

Uncategorized

Merck & Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA — Fosamax Once-Weekly Patent Obvious in Light of Prior Art Disclosing Same Dosing Concept; ‘About’ Carries Ordinary Meaning of ‘Approximately’

The Federal Circuit reversed the district court and invalidated Merck’s Fosamax once-weekly dosing patent as obvious, holding that prior art newsletter articles clearly disclosed once-weekly alendronate dosing, that the claim term ‘about’ retains its ordinary meaning of ‘appr

Uncategorized

Teva Pharmaceuticals v. Pfizer — Orange Book Patent Listing Alone Does Not Create Reasonable Apprehension of Suit for ANDA Declaratory Judgment

The Federal Circuit held that a patentee’s listing of a patent in the FDA Orange Book does not, by itself, create the reasonable apprehension of suit necessary for a generic drug maker to maintain a Hatch-Waxman declaratory judgment action challenging the patent’s validity or non-infring

Uncategorized

In re Klopfenstein — Publicly Displayed Slide Presentation at a Conference Qualifies as a Printed Publication Under § 102(b) Based on Public Accessibility

The Federal Circuit affirmed rejection of a patent application for lack of novelty, holding that a slide presentation displayed for several days at professional conferences constitutes a ‘printed publication’ under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) based on public accessibility — even without distribut

Uncategorized

Innova/Pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration — “Operatively Connected” Is a Functional Term Not Limited to Unitary Physical Attachment

The Federal Circuit vacated summary judgment of non-infringement, holding that the claim term ‘operatively connected’ means components must be connected in a way that permits them to perform their designated function — not that they must be physically attached in a unitary structure.

Uncategorized

Metabolite Laboratories v. Laboratory Corporation of America — Method Patent on Diagnosing Vitamin Deficiency by Correlating Homocysteine Levels Upheld

The Federal Circuit affirmed a jury verdict that LabCorp indirectly infringed Metabolite’s patent on a method of detecting vitamin B12 and folate deficiency by measuring and correlating homocysteine levels, a case that later reached the Supreme Court and raised fundamental questions about pate

Uncategorized

Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc. — Broad Monoclonal Antibody Claims Invalid When Specification Enables Only Murine Antibodies, Not Chimeric or Humanized Forms

The Federal Circuit affirmed invalidity of Chiron’s HER2 antibody patent, holding that claims broadly encompassing chimeric and humanized antibodies were not enabled by a specification that only disclosed murine antibodies, even though the claims were filed years before Herceptin was developed

Scroll to Top