Cook — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Justin Michael Cook v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe (Charlie Crist, 2009); WINOKUR (Rick Scott, 2015)
Date Decided
July 16, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1042
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Justin Michael Cook appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Alachua County, where Circuit Judge David Philip Kreider presided.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the arguments raised on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning. Cook was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for its ruling. Judges Rowe, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rationale beyond the affirmance itself.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place but offers no reasoning for attorneys to evaluate or apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore primarily limited to the parties and the disposition of Cook’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top