Cameron — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Eustace J. Cameron v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Ray (Rick Scott, 2011); KELSEY (Rick Scott, 2015)
Date Decided
July 16, 2026
Docket No.
1D2024-2438
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Eustace J. Cameron, representing himself, appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Leon County. Circuit Judge J. Lee Marsh presided below.

The appellate opinion does not identify the charges, Cameron’s arguments, the procedural history beyond the appeal, or the grounds on which the circuit court ruled. The State was represented on appeal by an assistant attorney general.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.” It provided no reasoning, legal analysis, or discussion of the issues presented. Judges Ray, Kelsey, and Long concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Leon County circuit court’s judgment.
  • The decision was unanimous and issued per curiam.
  • Because the opinion contains no reasoning or factual discussion, it does not disclose the legal basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends Cameron’s appeal in the First District unless altered through an authorized, timely post-decision motion or further review. Its significance is limited by the absence of any explanation of the facts, issues, or governing law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top