Williams v. State — denial of postconviction relief affirmed without opinion

Case
Horace K. Williams v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
KUNTZ (Rick Scott, 2016); CIKLIN (Charlie Crist, 2008)
Date Decided
August 3, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-0059
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Postconviction Relief, Rule 3.850
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Horace K. Williams sought postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 in the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. Circuit Judge Howard K. Coates, Jr. denied the motion.

Williams appealed the denial to Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal. The State was not required to appear in the appellate proceeding.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the order denying Williams’s Rule 3.850 motion.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the disposition and provided no reasoning, factual discussion, or analysis of Williams’s claims. Chief Judge Kuntz and Judges Ciklin and Conner concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The order denying Williams’s Rule 3.850 motion was affirmed.
  • The decision was per curiam and did not explain the basis for affirmance.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the trial court’s denial of postconviction relief in place. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning, the opinion does not identify the claims Williams raised or establish a stated rationale for rejecting them.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top